Blog details

Corporate Matters Before CCI: Supreme Court Jurisprudence Explained

Corporate Matters Before CCI: Supreme Court Jurisprudence Explained

  • 25 Jan 2026

Corporate Matters Handled by the

Competition Commission of India (CCI)

Blog by:
Jayprakash B. Somani
Advocate, Supreme Court of India & IP
Cell: PA 9322188701
www.jayprakashsomani.com
www.supremecourtlawfirm.com


1. Introduction to CCI

The Competition Commission of India (CCI) is a statutory body constituted under the Competition Act, 2002 to:

  • Prevent practices having adverse effect on competition (AAEC)

  • Promote and sustain competition in markets

  • Protect the interests of consumers

  • Ensure freedom of trade for market participants

The CCI plays a critical role in regulating corporate conduct, particularly in mergers, acquisitions, pricing practices, abuse of market power, and cartelisation.


2. Statutory Framework

  • Competition Act, 2002

  • Competition (Amendment) Act, 2007

  • Competition (Amendment) Act, 2023

  • CCI Regulations (Lesser Penalty, General Regulations, Combination Regulations, etc.)


3. Jurisdiction of CCI over Corporate Matters

CCI exercises jurisdiction over:

  1. Anti-Competitive Agreements (Section 3)

  2. Abuse of Dominant Position (Section 4)

  3. Combinations (M&A Control) (Sections 5 & 6)

  4. Cartels and Bid Rigging

  5. Vertical Restraints

  6. Leniency / Lesser Penalty Applications

  7. Digital Market & Platform Economy (emerging area)


4. Anti-Competitive Agreements (Section 3)

4.1 Horizontal Agreements (Section 3(3))

Agreements between enterprises at the same level of the production chain, such as:

  • Price fixing

  • Output limitation

  • Market allocation

  • Bid rigging / collusive bidding

Such agreements are presumed to cause AAEC.

Leading Case Laws

Excel Crop Care Ltd. v. CCI (2017) 8 SCC 47

  • Supreme Court laid down the principle for penalty computation

  • Penalty to be based on relevant turnover, not total turnover

Rajasthan Cylinders & Containers Ltd. v. Union of India (2018) 1 SCC 644

  • Mere parallel conduct is not enough to establish cartelisation

  • CCI must prove meeting of minds


4.2 Vertical Agreements (Section 3(4))

Agreements between enterprises at different stages, such as:

  • Tie-in arrangements

  • Exclusive supply/distribution

  • Resale price maintenance (RPM)

Evaluated under the Rule of Reason, not presumption.

Case Law

Fx Enterprise Solutions India Pvt. Ltd. v. Hyundai Motor India Ltd. (2017)

  • Discount control policies can amount to resale price maintenance


5. Abuse of Dominant Position (Section 4)

5.1 What Constitutes Abuse

  • Unfair or discriminatory pricing

  • Predatory pricing

  • Denial of market access

  • Leveraging dominance in one market to enter another

Dominance itself is not prohibited; abuse is.

Leading Case Laws

CCI v. Fast Way Transmission Pvt. Ltd. (2018) 4 SCC 316

  • Supreme Court upheld CCI’s finding of abuse of dominance

  • Emphasised consumer harm and market foreclosure

Uber India Systems Pvt. Ltd. v. CCI (2019) 8 SCC 697

  • Predatory pricing requires proof of dominance, intent, and below-cost pricing

Google LLC v. CCI (2023–24)

  • Abuse in digital markets

  • Tying, self-preferencing, data dominance

  • One of the most significant corporate competition rulings in India


6. Combination (Mergers & Acquisitions) Control

(Sections 5 & 6)

6.1 What is a Combination

  • Mergers

  • Amalgamations

  • Acquisitions of shares, control or assets

Above specified asset and turnover thresholds.

Mandatory pre-merger notification to CCI.

Key Corporate Issues Handled

  • Gun-jumping (failure to notify)

  • Structural and behavioural remedies

  • Market concentration analysis

Leading Case Laws

CCI v. Thomas Cook (India) Ltd. (2018) NCLAT

  • Acquisition of control must be notified

  • Even minority shareholding can amount to control

SCM Soilfert Ltd. / Bayer–Monsanto Merger Case

  • CCI imposed behavioural remedies to protect competition


7. Cartels & Leniency Regime

7.1 Cartel Enforcement

  • Heavy penalties (up to 10% of turnover)

  • Directors and officers can be personally liable

7.2 Lesser Penalty (Leniency)

  • First whistle-blower can get up to 100% penalty reduction

Case Law

CCI v. Aluminium Phosphide Tablet Manufacturers (2017)

  • One of the earliest cartel cases

  • Established cartel detection standards


8. Digital & New-Age Corporate Competition Issues

CCI increasingly handles cases involving:

  • Big Tech (Google, Amazon, Meta)

  • App stores and platform neutrality

  • Algorithmic pricing

  • Data as a source of dominance

The 2023 Amendment empowers CCI with settlement and commitment mechanisms.


9. Powers of CCI in Corporate Matters

  • Order cease and desist

  • Impose penalties

  • Modify agreements

  • Approve or block mergers

  • Order division of dominant enterprise (rare but statutory power)


10. Appellate Remedies

  • Appeal against CCI orders lies before NCLAT

  • Further appeal lies before the Supreme Court of India


11. Important Supreme Court Judgments on CCI Jurisdiction

BCCI v. CCI (2018) 10 SCC 521

  • Sports bodies are also enterprises under the Competition Act

SAIL v. CCI (2010) 10 SCC 744

  • Procedural safeguards

  • Scope of CCI’s prima facie powers under Section 26(1)


12. Penalties & Compliance for Corporates

ViolationPenalty
CartelUp to 3x profit or 10% turnover
Abuse of dominanceUp to 10% turnover
Gun-jumpingUp to 1% of total turnover
Non-compliance with ordersDaily penalties

13. Conclusion

The Competition Commission of India has emerged as a powerful regulator of corporate conduct in India. From M&A approvals to cartel enforcement, dominance abuse, and digital market regulation, CCI’s jurisdiction significantly impacts corporate strategy, governance, and compliance.

Supreme Court jurisprudence has consistently upheld the pro-competition and consumer-centric objectives of the Competition Act, while ensuring procedural fairness to corporates.